Categories
leadership Uncategorized

As a team lead …

As a team lead you need to know your team. You need to understand people. You don’t need to second guess them, you don’t need to micromanage them, but know what motivates them. Know what they need to perform at their best.

What tools do they covet? What routines matter? Do they need precision? Do they value gym time? Do they aspire to learn?

Understand their 6 month and their 5 year plan and help them achieve it. Make sure they know the team 6 month and 5 year plan and where they fit into it, and where that fits in the company plan.

Value them, and ensure they feel valued. Listen. Give them the grace to accept that which they cannot change but be sure they know you’d change it if you could.

Change what you can. Make their lives easier. Help them aspire to your job, even if they may fear the conflicts you protect them from. Keep your head whilst those about you are losing theirs.

Be the best team you can be. Discover the greatness in everyone. Play to strengths to see them through weaknesses. Move people. Change their roles. Find your gardeners and your innovators and Train them to replace you, because for certain times they will need to. Do not become vain or bitter for always there will be greater or lesser persons than yourself.

Let go. Trust them. Trust yourself. Let them do their job so you can do yours.

But lead, don’t follow. Have strong opinions, weakly held when a better way presents itself.

Let data guide you but not be your master. Don’t trust your gut.

Don’t be a stranger and make a full commitment to your team.

And make sure everyone knows the standards.

Categories
Uncategorized

2014 in review

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2014 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

A San Francisco cable car holds 60 people. This blog was viewed about 1,200 times in 2014. If it were a cable car, it would take about 20 trips to carry that many people.

Click here to see the complete report.

Categories
Uncategorized

2013 in review : agile, dynamic and dangerous data

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2013 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

A San Francisco cable car holds 60 people. This blog was viewed about 1,600 times in 2013. If it were a cable car, it would take about 27 trips to carry that many people.

Click here to see the complete report.

Categories
Uncategorized

Announcing DunDDD 2013

I hope to make it this year, are there any of my blog posts you want to hear in a talk format?

Scottish Developers

DDD ScotlandScottish Developers are pleased to announce that DunDDD 2013 will take place on Saturday 23rd November in the Queen Mother Building of the University of Dundee.

http://dun.dddscotland.com

This will be the 3rd DunDDD built on the popular foundation of the Developer! Developer! Developer! conference series which has spread to all corners of the UK and the international arena.  DDD conferences are community-run days where passionate and enthusiastic people come together to learn, share ideas, and to network within the many hubs of the development community. Best of all DDD events are free to everyone.

This year DunDDD will be featuring an entire track dedicated to Data Science.

Call for speakers

We are looking for sessions relating to all aspects of development from the code and technology level through to methodology and theory. DDD conferences are about sharing experience regardless of skill level so even if you have never spoken publicly…

View original post 100 more words

Categories
Uncategorized

2012 in review

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2012 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

600 people reached the top of Mt. Everest in 2012. This blog got about 2,100 views in 2012. If every person who reached the top of Mt. Everest viewed this blog, it would have taken 4 years to get that many views.

Click here to see the complete report.

Categories
Uncategorized

Developers in a Post-PC world

Photo09071631_1.jpg
Army of Me 5.25" floppy

So, last week I tweeted about the “Post-PC” world and sounded like a bit of an arrogant tosser.

Post-PC is the shift from devices built for personal creation to devices for consumption. I need to create.

https://twitter.com/#!/craignicol/status/166969581137707008

Today, I’m going to try and explain myself by sounding like an old fart.

My first computer was an 8-bit Toshiba MSX (yep, powered by Microsoft – still waiting for by MSX Basic MVP 😉 ), which wasn’t as popular as the other 8-bit platforms, but it shared one important feature : it booted into a programmable console. Anyone who wanted to use one of these machines had to start by learning a few lines of code, and it was the same code that a lot of the available software (well, games) were written in, so the user immediately started learning how to create new software. And that became important to me on each new platform, because I wanted to understand how they worked and what I could do with them.

I then moved on to Amstrad CP/M and then DOS machines. Still condole based, but there was a division between developing for the devices and interacting with them. I could easily load up QBasic in MSDOS and start writing graphical games (and then later port those to Borland C++), but there wasn’t a need to learn code to use the machines. Definitely an advantage for the average user, but at least the development tools were still one step away. That philosophy is one reason why I run Ubuntu on my home machine – it comes installed with Python 😀

And then came Windows 95 and development became an add-on. The computer grew up and divided those who wrote software into a special class apart from the normal users.

And then we get the Post-PC era, where not only do the devices not come with development tools, there are no add-ons available for those devices to develop on. The development has moved not only to another machine, but to another OS. So, we now need 2 devices, and the world of development becomes more disjoint from the world of users. I can see the benefits of it, I can see the different optimisations that need to be made for different use cases (and I understand why a lot of developers have a string reaction against Ubuntu Unity for a similar reason), but it leaves me with a nagging question of where the next generation of developers will come from. When your primary device is for consuming software that others have developed, the jump to developing your own software isn’t just a leap to learn a new package, it’s a leap to a new platform, which is a much bigger, scarier and more expensive step.

Unless the web wins, and all the Post-PC devices have a decent Javascript editor (or can run Cloud9 IDE or similar in their browser).

But maybe I’m just old and have a skewed view of the world.

For those in the audience who started developing in the Windows 95 era when development meant downloading something new, and taking a bigger step, what inspired you?

And what will inspire the next generation of developers to step up from their Post-PC device to a development PC?

Categories
code development programming test Uncategorized

Apprentice programmer

unlit olympic flame

Let’s talk about plumbing, and customer service, and an experience I had recently with a company I won’t name. Overall the experience was good, but I don’t want anyone to get into trouble because they’ve misinterpreted what I have said here. (and if you’re wondering about the picture : the Olympic flame isn’t lit either).

A couple of months ago, our gas combination boiler failed. It refused to start and complained that the flue was blocked. I sighed because we’d had the bearings on the fan replaced last year. So I called the service company to get it fixed.

A couple of days later, I was working from home to let the service technician in. He was fairly young but identified a problem. Unfortunately, a new part was required, so he had to come back the next day. He came back, replaced the part, fired up the boiler and all looked good. The next morning, no hot water and a flue warning 😦 it was the weekend by this point so we got a senior employee, who identified an error in the replacement part (fitted the wrong way) and identified the original problem as a blocked inlet. 5 minutes to identify, 1 hour to dismantle the boiler to get to the blockage and put it back together.

He finished, switched the boiler off, and then made sure it fired when put back together. Problem solved.

So, what did I learn, and why am I posting this on a programming blog?

Firstly, a monthly fee means that I didn’t have to worry about callout or parts, which was great, and left me less annoyed than I might have been.

Secondly, your first fix might not be the right fix. It looked right and it passed the first test, but caused problems later on (at the next restart). Ever written the wrong test and thought the problem was solved? Threading has caught me out in that way before.

Thirdly, just because it passes the test, doesn’t mean the problem is fixed. The boiler fired easily when the case was open and there was more airflow, but didn’t fire when the case was closed. Ever had a bug that only appeared in production or in a system test?

Fourthly, experts will find problems quicker than rookies, but rookies still need to learn.

Fifth, sometimes the only way to fix a problem, even a small one, is to tear everything apart, blow on it, and put it back together again.

The second guy also said something that struck a chord, as I’ve been trying to do it myself : he was disappointed that the company didn’t send the junior out with him so he could pass on his experience so that he’d learn for next time. Apparently, the fault itself is rare, so it’s a good learning opportunity. For developers : fix your own bugs, as there are a lot of things apprentice developers will see in the first few years after they graduate that are rare enough not to come up in university but common enough to be real problems in the real world. For example,
trusting user input (and the related buffer overrun bugs).

So, what have you learned from other professionals?

Categories
Uncategorized

Weekly (Scottish?) Developers Google+ Hangout?

I had an idea for running a book club for Google+ Hangouts, but after David Christiansen turned up, it became a more interesting catch-up, covering HP selling off WebOS, and discussing zaproxy ( http://code.google.com/p/zaproxy/ ) penetration testing tool and JIRA agile project management tool ( http://sandbox.onjira.com/secure/Dashboard.jspa?os_username=jens&os_password=password ).

Some good chat, but we were wondering if other Scottish Developers would be interested in a weekly Friday lunchtime hangout to shoot the breeze on the tech stories, tools and blogs of the week.

If you’re not on Google+ and need an invite, give me a shout and I’ll email one back to you, or click here for an invite : http://goo.gl/P0p2b . If you are interested and on Google+ come and find me at https://plus.google.com/112347442728934313588 and jump on in next time. Web cams and mic optional (if you’re a fast typist), but you will need speakers to listen in.

If there’s more good info, I might even start a weekly blog on it, but we’ll see how much interest there is.

What do the rest of you think?

Craig.

Categories
Uncategorized

Justice in Pakistan?

I’ve had an idea in my head for a while that I wanted to start
blogging about things a bit more political than my technical blog. Not
party political, because frankly, that bores me, but political in the
grander sense. Today I was having a discussion on Facebook about Osama
bin Laden, and whether killing can ever be a good thing. And I would
say that the question isn’t what is right, a question of if it is OK
in this circumstance, but not in that circumstance.

It is a question of justice and forgiveness. If justice and
forgiveness are to mean anything, then they, like the human rights
they are based on, must be universal. We cannot say “this person is
not worthy of justice” because then justice is hollow and becomes a
tool to control others by imposing values on others that you would not
follow yourself.

To demonise one man for his actions dehumanises both him and those who
oppose him. Simply calling him “evil” absolves you of responsibility
to hear his grievances. Not listening to the victim does not justify
the crime of murder. And for those who would say that he would not
give his victims compassion, I would ask why you choose his actions as
a guiding principle when you condemn those same actions in his hands?

Will this death undo all those who have died before? No. Will it stop
future terrorist attacks? Unfortunately not. Is celebrating death,
anyone’s death distasteful? Of course.

Do you want justice, revenge or compassion? What sort of person do you
really want to be?

Categories
Uncategorized

QConLondon 2011 : Day 3 review

Sorry for the big delay in getting this post out (one word : deadlines), but for both of you who’ve been waiting eagerly for this, here’s my review of day 3 of the QConLondon 2011 conference, unfortunately too late for the QConLondon Key Takeaway Points and Lessons Learned. For me, it was a bit of Mono and a lot of web. I’ll also include a quick round-up of the whole conference.

Keynote : Things I Wish I’d Known / Rod Johnson

A great dose of Dr Seuss philosophy to start the final day as Rod Johnson of Spring Software spoke about his experiences building a start-up, and included some advice that everyone should think about their career from that perspective, to find opportunities. He admitted from the start that this was not a technical talk, and I must admit that although I’ve used Spring.Net in the past, I never paid much attention to the Java world that inspired it.

As the rest of the conference showed, Spring has won the battle of ideas. Dependency Injection is part of the toolbox of every decent .Net and Java developer (and probably many others, but I’ve less experience there), but at the start of Spring, it was a hard struggle : there was a reason there was a gap in the market.

A lot of the talk covered similar ideas to the Pretotyping talk from the previous day, talking about throwing away ideas is easier than throwing away code, and adding that the best way to prove a concept is to try and prove yourself wrong. Mistakes are good, and can be recovered from, so long as the legal side is solid.

There was a lot of advice that seemed to be pitched more to the QCon SF audience, about how and when to pitch for funding (hints : hype is worth more than numbers, and always budget high because it will cost more than you think). It wasn’t a talk I think I would have attended had it not been the keynote, but there were some interesting takeaways, and it’s given me a bigger appreciation of the entrepreneur culture.

Advanced Reflection / Jean Baptiste Evain

This talk from JB Evain was primarily a demo of two very cool tools that come under Mono : Mono.Reflection and Mono.Cecil. There was one very interesting selling point : Mono.Cecil is used by ILSpy – an open source alternative to RedGate’s Reflector Pro. The overall theme was how to treat programs as data, so that behaviour can be changed at run time, and how System.Reflection falls a little short, such as missing support for multi-dimensional arrays.

The Mono.Reflection library consists of a set of extension methods over System.Reflection to add features such as Property.GetBackingField, and also to provide IL dissassembly at runtime.

Mono.Cecil works at the assembly level, providing a full object model for assemblies that works in Mono, .Net, Silverlight, Compact Framework and Windows Phone 7, and can interrogate cross-platform, allowing a desktop app to reflect over a WP7 assembly. There are some restrictions on support for code generated by System.Reflection.Emit() and for signed assemblies, but there was a great demo of the capabilities Mono.Cecil can add to a project, by enforcing an enum restriction on a generic type in a library class, that caused a compile error if a non-enum type was used in client code using code injection to insert IL bytecode into the compiled library. He then went one better with a preview of Milo, which used expression trees rather than IL to inject code for a much cleaner looking extension mechanism.

Node.js: Asynchronous I/O for Fun and Profit / Stefan Tilkov

Ever fancied writing your server side code in JavaScript? If you listen to Stefan Tilkov, maybe you will soon. He talked about a few of the headaches I’ve experienced in the ASP.Net/IIS world (and I’m sure they exist elsewhere) : how do you efficiently handle concurrency when you have a long-lived thread in a thread pool that spends most of its time eating memory and waiting for I/O from local storage or a back-end server? A thread that blocks is eating up resources and getting in your way when you want high throughput, especially for streaming.

Node.js, built on Google’s V8 javascript engine (part of the Chromium project), uses a single-thread event-loop style, similar to the UNIX select() that never blocks on I/O, because it passes that handling onto the kernel. This is the same concept as Nginx.

Unlike traditional servers, Nginx doesn’t rely on threads to handle requests. Instead it uses a much more scalable event-driven (asynchronous) architecture. This architecture uses small, but more importantly, predictable amounts of memory under load.

Node.js uses the Javascript callback architecture, familiar to any web developer who’s used XMLHttpRequest, exposing a number of I/O events, and exposing the entire API as asynchronous by default to encourage a high-performance architecture. The downside is that the code can be hard to follow, especially when multiple functions are chained together, although InfoQ has a few articles discussing libraries for making Asynchronous Javascript easier. It’s definitely worth having a look at the node.js samples from the talk if this interests you.

Webmachine: a practical executable model of HTTP / Justin Sheehy

HTTP is a state machine. Look at how Webmachine sees it:

Webmachine is not a web server, or a REST framework, it’s an Erlang toolkit for building HTTP-based systems, by allowing you to override the state machine above as you wish. It’s a strict implementation of the HTTP standard that has turned up a few problems with the structure of the spec. It was described as a “gateway drug into Erlang”. It’s a fascinating project, and it’s been ported to a few other platforms. It feels to me how all HTTP engines should be written, although sometimes I like having a framework. As he said, a framework is “a finished app with some bits ripped out.”

Secure Distributed Programming on EcmaScript 5 + HTML5 platforms / Mark S. Miller

This is a hard one to talk about. I’ve seen the talk, I’ve seen Mark S. Miller’s QCon SF talk, and I’m still not 100% sure I follow it. The basic idea is that we need a better way to transmit secure information between 3rd party sites. We need a way to transfer our trust in an ecommerce site to our bank so that they can pay the site on our behalf without compromising our details in the process. The solution, Dr. SES, seems to be an API-key on steroids, where the key itself is an executable piece of javascript, provided to the user by one server, that the user can then pass to another server, providing the ability for users to create side effects such as 3rd party authentication channels (SMS security?) and token revocation providing the user with greater control over how the associations they have created can be used.

The other brilliant part of the talk was the discussion of Ptolomy and the retrograde movement of the planets. The model of circular orbits was flawed, so additional circles were added to the models each time it was found to be broken. The argument was browser security was built the same way, with each security breach, a new circle was added, rather than rebuilding the model from scratch with security built in. The identity-centric model that has driven browsers until now should give way to the authentication-centric model provided by the strategies discussed in the talk.

HTML5 and the dawn of rich mobile web applications / James Pearce

James Pearce of Sencha gave a convincing argument that HTML5 is ready for cross-platform apps, helped by a few demos available on the Sencha site. The argument is helped by the rather fragmented state of the mobile market, where RIM, Android, Apple and Nokia are all significant players, each with their own language and capabilities.

The mobile web, he argued, is not just the web on a smaller screen. The new generation of web enabled devices have additional capabilities such as cameras, geolocation, accelerometers, and also, as many mobile websites forget, a phone. So don’t forget a phone number is much easier to use than a “Contact Us” form.

On the desktop, progressive enhancement is used to support older browsers without javascript up to newer browsers. On mobile, the baseline includes javascript and many HTML5 and CSS3 features, and progressive enhancement is used for querying for device access, using libraries such as caniuse.com, Modernizr and deviceatlas.com, as well as a number of frameworks to normalise behaviour across devices, such as jQuery mobile versions, and Sencha’s own frameworks, that include an MVC-based touch client that talks to a web services backend. He also mentioned the image resizing site at tinysrc.mobi. If you pass a URL as http://i.tinysrc.mobi/http://your.url.here : , the site will render the correct size for your device.

The other great tool mentioned in the talk was PhoneGap that allows developers to design an app using web technologies, then compile it down to a native app so it can be listed on the various app stores, providing device access that is usually not available to web sites.

Overall review

This was a fascinating conference and I hope I get the chance to attend again, although there were a few disappointing themes across the board. There was a lot of talk about the release fast, release often philosophy with only 1 speaker (Mike Lee) suggesting waiting a bit and making a better quality product is a valid strategy. The technical talks were the main reason I went, but I’m very glad I attended some of the less technical and more thoughtful talks, and talks about technologies I’m probably never going to use, because they made me think about the problems I’m trying to solve in a different way. Webmachine was a perfect example of this. I can’t see myself ever using it in a project, but I might use one of the ports, and it definitely made me think more about HTTP and what it means, which has fed back into my understanding of REST and web technologies in general. I think that breadth is the key to this conference. If you’re going next year, be sure to embrace the diversity.